Contents

 

Feature Article The Da Vinci Code by Gregg Strawbridge

Educational Helps by Ned Bustard and Matt Clark

Free Offers

Q&A

Announcements

 

June 2006


Feature Article

 

The Da Vinci Code

 

Dan Brown’s, The Da Vinci Code is being called the best selling “theological thriller” ever. As a murder-mystery action story it boasts phenomenal success. To date it has sold 60.5 million copies since its publication in March of 2003. Now on the silver screen, it is incarnate through moguls like producer Ron Howard (aka Opie) and leading man, Tom Hanks (aka Forrest Gump). After opening on May 19, it raked in $77 million the opening weekend domestically and $224 million worldwide. Now in less than two weeks it is up to $462 million worldwide.

 

It features some fast action, intriguing cryptography, and pretentious art talk, besides your basic flat characters, and Christological heresies. It is the back story that has caused all the fuss. You guessed it—the true secret of the holy grail encoded in the art and architecture of Western Civilization. What is this great secret which a self-flagellating albino monk will kill for? To conceal the marriage of Jesus and Mary Magdalene and more particularly their royal bloodline—the true holy grail.

 

Full of the lame claim that the Church suppressed the real story about Jesus, told by the Dead Sea Scrolls and other “gospels” rejected from the Bible by Constantine. The Church conspiracy was to fabricate a Divine Jesus through the Council of Nicea to gain political power and dominate the simple, good-hearted pagans who exalted the divine feminine. Thus the conniving Church hid the truth that Jesus was merely human and married to Mary Magdalene, with whom he had a child.

 

Even though it is a novel, the book prominently claims, “Fact: . . . All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals in this novel are accurate.” One of the characters (Sir Leigh Teabing) proclaims that Jesus’ divinity was determined by a “relatively close vote” at the Council of Nicea. “Until that moment in history, Jesus was viewed by His followers as a mortal prophet” (p. 233). “The Bible, as we know it today, was collated by the pagan Roman emperor Constantine the Great” (p. 231).

 

While there are not quite as many errors and factual mistakes in the book as copies sold, pretty much nothing in the book is trustworthy beyond what you can see. There is a museum in Paris and a church in Scotland, but all references to history and sources on Jesus are contorted beyond recognition. And don’t take your history lessons from the likes of Opie and Forrest Gump.

 

A general knowledge of the ancient world shows the cartoon of Christian history drawn by the book as a farcical absurdity: It was really paganism, not Christianity, which valued humanity? It was really the gnostic [from the Greek word gnosis, knowledge] texts which make Jesus human? The canonical gospels only show Jesus as divine? The Dead Sea Scrolls tell the true story of Jesus and Mary Magdalene? The pagans exalted the high status of women in the world before Christianity?  If you believe these things, then I have some beach front property in Orlando, Florida, for you. These claims are anything but “facts.” Still, many have been seduced to grant them credibility. After first reading the book, I thought there were so many factual blunders that Mr. Brown (and perhaps editors) knowingly included agitating inaccuracies to increase the controversy. “Fact: The book has made a lot of money from the controversy it created.” “Fact: All sales figures for the hardback edition are accurate.” Unfortunately, it is evident from what Mr. Brown has said publicly that he does take the historical claims seriously. “As I started researching The Da Vinci Code, I really thought I would disprove a lot of this theory about Mary Magdalene and Holy Blood and all of that. I became a believer” (ABC News Special, November 3, 2003).

 

His sources are nothing less than sensationalist speculations passed off to an uncritical public. He depends upon low brow conspiracy theorists for his “facts,” most notably Holy Blood, Holy Grail by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, Henry Lincoln (1983). This non-fiction is about at the level of “the Egyptian pyramids were created by extra-terrestrials.” It speculates endlessly about a conspiracy of certain secret societies, who were the guardians of the Merovingian Bloodline—vis-a-vis the progeny of Jesus and Mary Magdalene.

 

Like the book, the film took the audiences on the same magical, mysterious, fallacious tour. I thought the film downplayed some of the more ridiculous anti-facts. But it certainly increased the overall yarn of Mary Magdalene as the symbol, if not the actual, “sacred feminine” goddess. When my wife and I saw the film, we noticed that the theater was packed with teens. We asked those seated around us if any had read the book. The answer in every case was “no,” but someone they knew had read it. Furthermore, it seemed that many, like the author of the book himself, believe the Da Vinci Code mythology.

 

This only reinforces my impression of our culture. Many people get their views from television, their history from the movies, and what they read in non-fiction books like Holy Blood is received as almost infallible revelation. Such minds pose a blank canvas on which an enterprising novelist can paint. While any sixth-grader with a World Book could debunk the “facts” of The Da Vinci Code, the culture at large craves the novel, the sensational, and the provocative.

 

The truth about the canon of the books accepted in the New Testament has nothing to do with an alleged Constantinian conspiracy. The Dead Sea Scrolls are pre-Christian and do not reference the historical Jesus at all. Christian and non-Christian scholars alike agree the second and third century, “Secret Gnostic Gospels” are falsely attributed to their authors (Thomas, Philip, Mary, Peter, etc.). They are “pseudepigrapha”—false writings of gnostics to promote their religious views. Mr. Brown is quite erroneous in presenting these texts as authentic accounts from the actual followers of Jesus. A more basic error, if there could be one, is that texts such as the “Gospel of Philip,” quoted in the book, present the humanity of a married Jesus. Gnosticism promotes a supra-spiritualist view of Jesus who helps his followers escape from this evil material creation. Humanity, marriage, and child-bearing are denigrated by gnosticism, not least in the Gospel of Philip: “. . . the undefiled marriage a true mystery! It is not fleshly, but pure.”

 

These second and third century texts are far removed in every way (linguistically, idealogically, and geographically) from the Jewish context of the first century, Jesus of Nazareth. On the other hand, the earliest (actual) extant document we have is a copy of a piece of the Gospel of John (a fragment known as "Papyrus 52"). This copy is dated to the early 100s. The original, written decades earlier declares that the “Word was God” and “became flesh” (1:1, 14). Even earlier, First Corinthians dates to the 50s A.D. In it Paul teaches the divinity and humanity of Jesus and mounts a sustained argument for the physicality of the resurrection of Jesus’ body (1 Cor. 15:22–26, 51–58). Here Paul makes a striking factual claim that the resurrected Jesus appeared to the apostles and to “over five hundred brethren at once, of whom the greater part remain to the present, but some have fallen asleep” (1 Cor. 15:6–7). 

 

By the popularity of the book and film, thankfully, some people who slumbered in biblical oblivion are awakening to talk of Jesus, ancient history, and alleged Bible books. Armed with the true-facts, we may seize this opportunity to tell of a gospel which liberates from the falsehoods of sin and crowns humanity by union with the reigning Son of God. To those who have put on Christ, writes Paul, there is real equality, “neither male nor female” (Gal. 3:28). This gospel is not “secret” or conspiratorial. It is open for examination. There would have been no scandal at all had Jesus simply been a mere man, who fathered a child with Mary Magdalene. The real scandal and astounding factual claim is one that created martyrs from traitors, preachers from fishermen, and ministers from murderers like Paul, and it is this: God raised Jesus from the dead.

 

In the classical Christian education community, this confirms to us that at a very basic level we stand against our culture with a gospel bound together with a civilization. It also confirms and provides another instance of why classical Christian training must prevail among the faithful. In this environment, now as much as ever, we must train ourselves and our children to think through truth claims and have the discipline to reason through a wasteland of data. In a relativistic age Francis Schaeffer coined, “true truth.” Now we must show our children that a Christian view of history is not just our story of faith, it is true fact.

 

Within the Christian world why are such claims credible? On the one hand there is the unorthodox enlightenment, institutional Christianity which reduced our faith to the “fatherhood of God” and the “brotherhood of man.” Jesus, instead of invoking creative power in feeding the 5,000, is nothing more than an enlightened avatar showing us how to share our sack lunches. We now have a legacy of liberal Protestantism which has proofed Scripture with the anti-supernatural spell-checker to remove anything without a purely natural explanation. On the other hand, there is a well-meaning fundamentalist reaction. If the King James Version was “good enough for Paul, it’s good enough for me.” The Bible and Christian orthodoxy dropped from the sky with golden confetti.

 

The antidote to enlightenment rationalism and simplistic Biblicism is surely classical Christian education. A Christian education should prepare students with the knowledge of Christian history so as to appreciate the providence of God in shaping early orthodox doctrine and the marvelous collation of the canon of Scripture. A classical education ought to impart a knowledge of the classical world which shows the blunders of Dan Brown to be perfectly absurd.

 

Gregg Strawbridge

 

Gregg Strawbridge is Pastor of All Saints’ Presbyterian Church and the author of the essay published by Veritas Press entitled Classical and Christian Education.

 


Educational Helps

 

Leonardo di Ser Piero da Vinci

 

Leonardo was a botanist, biologist, engineer, military adviser, architect, painter and sculptor. He lived from 1452 to 1519, the peak of the Italian Renaissance. He was famous and influential and circulated within some pretty powerful circles—popes and princes and such.

 

Leonardo worked for Ludovico Sforza, the Duke of Milan, for nearly eighteen years, and it was the Duke who commissioned the very famous paint called The Last Supper. Its dimensions are 15 x 29 feet, and it was painted between 1495 and 1498. It was painted using dry plaster instead of using tempera on wet plaster, and it began to flake off the wall almost immediately. People have been attempting to restore it ever since.

 

Much is said in The Da Vinci Code about art and symbolism and how it is possible to read pictures like puzzles. In some cases this is true to a point, but in the vast majority of cases, it is not. There are four pictures that the book is mainly concerned with, all of which are by Leonardo da Vinci: The Vitruvian Man, The Madonna of the Rocks, The Mona Lisa, and The Last Supper.

 

The Da Vinci Code makes art out to be full of mysterious symbols that helped obfuscate and bury knowledge so it would be very difficult to find. This is not the case at all. At the time that da Vinci was working, there were emblem books in print that explained the symbols found in art. Symbols were meant to communicate not hide. This is not to say that the symbolism couldn’t be complex and subtle; it could. It just wasn’t meant to be a language for an exclusive crowd.

 

There’s Something about Mary

 

The theory in The Da Vinci Code, first publicized in The Templar Revelation by Lynn Picknett and Clive Prince, is that the person to the left of Jesus is really Mary Magdalene, not the apostle John. It is also claimed that if one looks above the figure of Bartholomew, a grail-like image appears above him. But critics have pointed out that:

►While damage makes it impossible to be sure of the figure’s gender, he is wearing male clothing.

►There are only thirteen figures in the painting, so if John is Mary Magdalene, then there is an apostle missing.

►Some of the painting’s preliminary sketches were preserved and none show female faces.

►The grail image only appears when looking at the painting from a distance. Upon closer inspection, the painting reveals a cluster of geometrical shapes. They only appear to form a golden chalice when parts are deliberately obstructed.

 

The Last Supper

 

All this talk about The Da Vinci Code gives us a good excuse to spend some time with some good art. The Last Supper is a theme that has been returned to again and again throughout art history. We will look at Leonardo’s and two other artist’s interpretations of the event and then get out some crayons and do some reinterpretations of these grand works of art in torch red, aquamarine, raw umber, midnight blue, laser lemon, cerulean, granny smith apple, tickle me pink, and fuzzy wuzzy brown. Click here to go to the page where you can download the Last Supper coloring pages.

 

Besides Leonardo da Vinci, the two other artists whose works have been translated into coloring pages are Jacopo Bassano and Pieter Pourbus.

 

Jacopo Bassano (also known as Giacomo da Ponte, c. 1515–1592) was an Italian painter who was born and died in Bassano del Grappa near Venice, from which he adopted the name. His father Francesco Bassano the Elder was a “peasant artist,” and Jacopo adopted some of his style as he created religious paintings with novel features including animals, farmhouses, and landscapes. Having worked in Venice and other Italian towns, he established a workshop in Bassano with his four sons: Francesco the Younger (1549–1592), Gerolamo (1566–1621), Giovanni Battista (1553–1613), and Leandro (1557–1622).

 

Pieter Pourbus (1510–1584) painted portraits and religious subjects. His Last Judgment is in the Bruges Museum; the Metropolitan Museum has his Portrait of a Young Woman. The Last Supper, dated 1548, is the earliest known painting by the artist. The painting reveals his tendency toward unusual iconographical programmes—a monstrous figure with claws and a skull enters the room from the right in the direction of Judas, who exits purse in hand.

 

Project

Before coloring them, look at these three paintings (in color if possible) and then try to answer the questions that follow. (To view each painting online, click the following links: da Vinci, Bassano, Pourbus.)

 

1. What moment in time is the artwork showing?

2. What “props” are placed in the scene by the artist, and how do they help to tell the story?

3. Who’s who in the painting? Identify the apostles.

 

Ned Bustard and Matt Clark

 

Ned Bustard is a graphic designer who spends much of his productive time working on Veritas Press things. He is the author of Legends and Leagues and Squalls Before War: His Majesty’s Schooner Sultana. Matt Clark teaches art at Veritas Academy and is a frequent illustrator of Veritas Press materials, including the Omnibus texts.

 


Free Offers

 

Two Williams Teaser, Release II

You may be familiar with the Monroe Family Chronicles series by Douglas Wilson that tracks the history of America. The first two volumes, Blackthorn Winter and Susan Creek covering piracy in the early 1700’s and The First Great Awakening, respectively, are in print and available from us. The manuscript for the third installment, Two Williams, covering the War for Independence, is complete, and the artist has begun illustrating it. We expect the book to be available in September. We are herewith releasing installments of the book, a couple chapters at a time for you as an epistula reader. Click here to view the next installment. But be warned: we may not release the whole book in this format.

 


Q&A

 

Q. How do I use the Omnibus Grading Calculator? Where do the Summas fit? What do you mean by homework? How do you grade class participation?

A. The simple answer is to follow the written directions carefully to use the calculator. Summas, homework and class participation tend to be more applicable to a school setting. However, in a homeschool setting an example of homework might be the writing of an answer to any of the session questions, including the Summas, that you evaluate and grade. Class participation generally is an evaluation of how well and how often a student participates in classroom discussions. It would not have a good parallel in a homeschool setting. Frequent grades for these exercises will increase the quality of the student’s work since he knows it is being evaluated.

 

Q. What is The Chicago Manual of Style?

 A. Growing out of a list of proofreading and usage rules that were compiled by the University of Chicago Press, The Chicago Manual of Style is a reference book for writers, students and editors. No doubt every student faces questions when writing a research paper or documenting sources. How should I list each reference? Should I put the author's last name first? How do I format footnotes or endnotes? Conventions for documenting sources have varied among disciplines and publishers. Different guidelines are preferred in various fields of study, for example the MLA style for the humanities, the APA style for psychology and the social sciences, or the CSE style for the sciences. The Chicago Manual of Style presents and compares the humanities style of documentation (preferred by many in history, literature and the arts) and the author-date system (favored by those in the physical and natural sciences). Learning to use a style manual will prepare a student for whatever style requirements he may face in the years to come in his educational and professional career.

 

Please submit any questions you’d like answered here to info@veritaspress.com.

 


Announcements

 

Veritas Press Tutorial Service

Space is still available in classes for our first foray into a tutorial service.  Omnibus I (Primary Books) and Greek I are the two classes being offered. Class size is extremely limited and the classes are filling quickly. So, if you are interested check out the information on our home page.  Note: we have changed the age requirement to 12 before the first class (9/11/06). One of you pointed out that most seventh–graders were twelve at that point. Shame on us for not figuring correctly. Some with 12 year-olds who inquired were notified. If you were not notified we probably lost contact info so please contact us if you would like to register for either course.

 

2006 Veritas Academy Teacher Training
July 19–21, 2006, Lancaster, Pa. Douglas and Nancy Wilson will be the keynote speakers. Brochures have been mailed. If you have not received one and would like one, please call
717-556-0690 to request one. Find more information at www.veritasacademy.com.

 

Teachers Needed at Veritas Academy

The school is expanding and needs more teachers. Interested candidates may apply at www.veritasacademy.com/faculty.htm

 


If you prefer not to receive the newsletter, simply click here to let us know.

 

Visit us on the web at www.veritaspress.com or call us at 1-800-922-5082.